ESG Score Boosts Stock Excess Returns: From the Perspective of Information
School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
| Abstract: | This study examines whether environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance improves risk-adjusted stock returns and identifies the information-transmission channels underlying this relationship. Using an unbalanced panel of 1,104 Chinese A-share listed firms from 2011 to 2019 and Bloomberg ESG scores, the analysis employs a two-way fixed-effects model with firm-level clustered standard errors. The baseline results show that higher ESG scores are significantly associated with higher stock excess returns, measured by the Sharpe ratio. Mechanism tests further indicate that ESG performance affects stock returns by alleviating information asymmetry, concentrating investors' limited attention, and strengthening investor confidence. The information-asymmetry channel exhibits a masking effect, whereas analyst coverage and investor confidence operate as partial mediators. The baseline findings remain robust after using lagged ESG scores, applying a city-peer ESG instrumental variable in a two-stage least-squares framework, replacing the dependent and explanatory variables, adding additional controls, and winsorizing continuous variables. Heterogeneity tests show that the positive ESG effect is stronger for non-state-owned firms, heavily polluting firms, and firms located in more market-oriented regions. Further analysis indicates that the environmental and governance dimensions are the principal drivers of the aggregate ESG effect and that institutional ownership partially mediates the ESG-return relationship. Overall, the findings show that ESG performance is relevant not only to corporate fundamentals but also to the transmission and incorporation of firm-specific information into stock prices, with implications for listed firms, investors, financial institutions, and regulators. |
| Keywords: | ESG; Information Transmission; Information Asymmetry; Limited Attention; Investor Confidence; Stock Excess Returns |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjeb.2026.02.002 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2026-07-13
接受日期: 2026-08-11
在线出版日期: 2026-09-07
参考文献
| [1] | Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., and Starks, L. T. Firms and Social Responsibility: A Review of ESG and CSR Research in Corporate Finance [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2021, 66: 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889 |
| [2] | Ni, Hengwang, Li, Changqing, and Wei, Zhihua. Media Coverage, Voluntary Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility Information and Financing Constraints [J]. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 2015, 37(11): 77-88. |
| [3] | Wang, Linlin, Lian, Yonghui, and Dong, Jie. Mechanism of the Effect of ESG Performance on Firm Value [J]. Securities Market Herald, 2022(5): 23-34. |
| [4] | Li, Jin. ESG Risk Premium and Excess Returns in China's A-Share Market [J]. Securities Market Herald, 2021(6): 24-33. |
| [5] | Godfrey, P. C. The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(4): 777-798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878 |
| [6] | Zhou, Fangzhao, Pan, Wanying, and Fu, Hui. ESG Responsibility Performance of Listed Companies and Institutional Investors' Shareholding Preferences: Evidence from China's A-Share Listed Companies [J]. Scientific Decision Making, 2020(11): 15-41. |
| [7] | Edmans, A. Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101(3): 621-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 |
| [8] | Zhang, Zongxin, and Wang, Hailiang. Investor Sentiment, Subjective Belief Updating and Market Volatility [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013(4): 142-155. |
| [9] | Tao, Jianhong, and Zhang, Tong. Research on ESG Performance of Listed Companies and Individual Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms [J]. Marketing Management Review, 2021(22): 191-192. |
| [10] | Zhang, Lin, and Zhao, Haitao. Does Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies [J]. Wuhan Finance, 2019(10): 36-43. |
| [11] | Liu, Xuexin, Wu, Xinyu, and Kong, Xiaoxu. ESG Performance of Listed Companies and Stock Returns: From the Perspective of Firm-Specific Information Content in Stock Prices [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2023(10): 85-93. |
| [12] | Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., and Tarmuji, N. H. The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Practices (ESG) on Economic Performance: Evidence from ESG Score [J]. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2016, 7(3): 67-74. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501 |
| [13] | Lei, Guangyong, Wang, Wen, and Jin, Xin. Corporate Governance Quality, Investor Confidence and Stock Returns [J]. Accounting Research, 2012(2): 79-86, 97. |
| [14] | Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., and Yang, Y. G. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting [J]. The Accounting Review, 2011, 86(1): 59-100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 |
| [15] | Bharath, S. T., Pasquariello, P., and Wu, G. Does Asymmetric Information Drive Capital Structure Decisions? [J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(8): 3211-3243. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn076 |
| [16] | Hirshleifer, D., Lim, S. S., and Teoh, S. H. Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News [J]. The Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(5): 2289-2325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01501.x |
| [17] | Liu, Yan, and Zhu, Hongquan. Individual and Institutional Investors: Who Drives Stock Price Changes in China's A-Share Market? From the Perspective of Heterogeneous Investor Beliefs [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(4): 120-130. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.04.014 |
| [18] | Wang, Jitian, Ma, Shan, and Tian, Boao. ESG Performance and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Moderating Effects of Investor Sentiment and Executive Overconfidence [J]. Journal of Financial Development Research, 2022(10): 65-72. |
| [19] | Ma, Xili. Does an ESG Investment Strategy Have a Risk-Screening Function? Evidence from China's A-Share Market [J]. Northern Finance, 2019(5): 14-19. |
| [20] | Yi, Lingxue, Jiang, Yichi, and Yao, Shujie. Research on the Value Creation Effect of Corporate ESG Practice: A Test Based on the Perspective of External Pressure [J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2022, 41(10): 93-110. https://doi.org/10.19592/j.cnki.scje.391581 |
| [21] | General Office of the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China. Notice on Issuing the Industry Classification Directory for Environmental Verification of Listed Companies [Z]. Huan Ban Han (2008) No. 373, 2008. |
| [22] | Yu, Honghai, Xu, Longbing, and Chen, Baizhu. The Control Right of Ultimate Controlling Shareholder and Overinvestment of Free Cash Flow [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2010, 45(8): 103-114. |
| [23] | Wen, Zhonglin, and Ye, Baojuan. Analyses of Mediating Effects: The Development of Methods and Models [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 731-745. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731 |
| [24] | Shen, Hongbo, Xie, Yue, and Chen, Zhengrong. Corporate Environmental Protection, Social Responsibility and Market Effects: A Case Study of the Zijin Mining Environmental Pollution Incident [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2012(1): 141-151. https://doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2012.01.014 |
| [25] | Liu, Jingjun, and Xu, Haoping. Institutional Investors: Long-Term Investors or Short-Term Opportunists? [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2012(9): 141-154. |
